| So , how was computer paper? | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Arya Nair Active member
| Subject: So , how was computer paper? Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:31 pm | |
| it wasn't that easy for me. |
|
| |
Apurva Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:34 pm | |
| it ws okay just like all other papers |
|
| |
NEWBIE
| Subject: Re: How was the paper. Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:55 pm | |
| Well it was brilliant!! I am not too sure but i might just get 98. I am expecting full in programs but i am not too sure about the triangle pattern question. There was a mistake. There were supposed to be 6 sixes but there were only 5. Otherwise it was pretty much fine. |
|
| |
Arya Nair Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:15 pm | |
| yah...i asked the invigilator and he told me not to attempt that question in case they don't give full marks for that. |
|
| |
siya Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:17 pm | |
| yeah datz y i had 2 leave it...u know....it was d simplest n less time consumin....i felt very bed leavin it!! well overall....d paper was gud... |
|
| |
Shruti !!! Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:52 pm | |
| Heyyyy Frndz Welll it was a bit bad 4 me specially for the triangle one.................... i guess the theory was much better dan d progs........... wellllllll wasnt it lendy.............????????? |
|
| |
pavan Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:19 pm | |
| it was little tuf fr me........... i'dnt do well |
|
| |
Anu..i luv icse...:) Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:42 pm | |
| it was so easy!! man...i was jumping all around!! thank god!! now, i want maths to be easier!!! heheheh...greedy humans!! i didnt attempt the pattern n the string questions... both sections were equally good,,practically, board ppl had given us the procedure to write the programs also!! eg, for that overloading method and the buzz n gcd nums...they had given us the whole thing in the question itself!! well, now forget abut this, conc on maths!! |
|
| |
tanisha
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:39 pm | |
| i wanted to know whether the checking in computers is easy or really tough???? |
|
| |
crystal4ever! Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:13 pm | |
| hey,..........i didnt even notice the 6 missing.......so tehy wont give marks or will dey give marks???? its a mistake on their part rite???? ya the overloading question ws really easy.........practically the whole prgm ws given! |
|
| |
Arya Nair Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:23 pm | |
| i dunno whether they'll give marks for that. most of my friends attempted that one. |
|
| |
Arya Nair Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:37 pm | |
| 3 subjects over......next exam is maths..... |
|
| |
crystal4ever! Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:38 pm | |
| ya......maths....so far all the boardz have been pretty easy quests, rite??? hgope this 1 will also b easy!! |
|
| |
Vaibhav Garg Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:21 am | |
| hey was that a mistak in thae patten question??????? well newayzz the benefit of doubt will be given otherwise the paper was cool n wat did u all write in that class variables 1?? |
|
| |
siya Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:53 am | |
| yeah...i 2 had a confusion in it...well i rote dere us no class(static)variables as such but 2 instance variables a n b....ya ya i know..a diplomatic answer...but nothin came in2 my brain dat tym.. |
|
| |
Arya Nair Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:03 pm | |
| thew pattern should have one more a '6', you didn't notice? |
|
| |
Boris Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:21 pm | |
| hey frndz comp paper was gr8 perhaps the best so far. the pattern question had a mistake it shud have had 1 more 6. but it was the mistake of paper setters .So I hope they will give marks for it.
and bst of luck for MATHS to all of u |
|
| |
Arya Nair Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:17 pm | |
| yah...all the best , everyone.... |
|
| |
Vaibhav Garg Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:36 am | |
| i thnk ur anser is correct!!!!! |
|
| |
JiGaR Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:36 pm | |
| awsom expectin nt less then 95 |
|
| |
abhi_1993 Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:57 pm | |
| computer was gr8...and d pattern 1..u will b given d benefit of doubt...in fact...somtimes d ICSE gives full marks 2 all those whu attempt an incorrect question...even if d ans is not perfect...thats what our teacher told us...so evry1 attempted dat question |
|
| |
JiGaR Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:00 pm | |
| lol...i know but i put the rite logic six times six... |
|
| |
abhi_1993 Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:24 pm | |
| same here |
|
| |
JiGaR Active member
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:35 pm | |
| lol |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: So , how was computer paper? | |
| |
|
| |
| So , how was computer paper? | |
|